The Latest from Cloisters

News, Publications, Policies, Events and Blogs

Farmah v Birmingham City Council: A warning for all multiple claims

Daphne Romney QC considers the recent far-ranging EAT decision of Farmah & ors v Birmingham City Council , a copy of which is available here . Farmah does not just affect multiple equal pay claims brought in an Employment Tribunal (ET). It affects all multiple claims brought in an ET, for example TUPE and failure to consult or unilateral variat...
Continue reading

Sian McKinley to speak at the LSE

Sian McKinley spoke about Corporate Restructuring Law for the London School of Economics on 23 June, focusing on employers’ obligations when restructuring business in UK and the impact of TUPE.
Featured

Appeal court to scrutinise legality of enhanced shared parental pay

Appeal court to scrutinise legality of enhanced shared parental pay
Rachel Crasnow QC and Siân McKinley of Cloisters look at the recent decision of Ali v Capita Customer Management Ltd (ET1800990/2016) regarding enhanced Shared Parental Pay. For the first time, the employment tribunal has upheld a complaint of sex discrimination from a male employee who was refused enhanced Shared Parental Pay. While this decision ...
Continue reading
Featured

‘Promoting’ restrictive covenants – the start of a new direction of travel post Egon Zehnder Ltd v Tillman

‘Promoting’ restrictive covenants – the start of a new direction of travel post Egon Zehnder Ltd v Tillman
Jacques Algazy QC and Nathaniel Caiden consider whether the case of Egon Zehnder Ltd v Tillman [2017] EWHC 1278 (Ch) marks the start of a trend whereby restrictive covenants against employees will be increasingly upheld owing to an employer’s ‘future intention’ of the employees’ progress (that is promotions and increasing seniority).     ...
Continue reading
Featured

Identifying direct discrimination in “proxy cases” after R (on the application of Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice

Identifying direct discrimination in “proxy cases” after R (on the application of Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice
Dee Masters considers the recent Supreme Court decision of R (on the application of Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 which was handed down on 24 May 2017.  A copy of the judgment is available here . Overview Coll is compulsory reading for discrimination lawyers. Lady Hale, who provided the leading judgment, examines the ex...
Continue reading