The Latest from Cloisters

News, Publications, Policies, Events and Blogs

Ed Williams and Catriona Stirling represent successful appellants in the EAT in ground-breaking TUPE case

Ed Williams and Catriona Stirling represent successful appellants in the EAT in ground-breaking TUPE case

Ed Williams and Catriona Stirling appeared for the successful appellants in the EAT in the ground-breaking TUPE case of Hyde Housing Association Ltd and Others v Layton, in which judgment has now been handed down.

The ET had held that, in circumstances where A’s employment with B transferred to joint and several employment with B and other employers, there was a relevant transfer for the purposes of Regulation 3(1)(a) of TUPE.

Upholding the employers’ appeal, the EAT held that, although Regulation 3(1)(a) did not preclude a relevant transfer to multiple transferees, where the original transferor remained liable for the Claimant’s employment, the situation would not fall under the protection of TUPE. 

That was so as a matter of construction. It was also consistent with the protective purpose of the Acquired Rights Directive – in particular the purpose of ensuring that the rights of employees are safeguarded in the event of a change of employer. That protection could not extend to those cases where the employee’s legal position vis-à-vis the employer was unchanged. 

This case is likely to have far-reaching implications in areas where employees are commonly jointly and severally employed by a number of employees, such as in partnerships and in the housing association sector.

Declan O’Dempsey to lead workshop at the European ...
Why the Government is failing disabled people on a...