The Latest from Cloisters

News, Publications, Policies, Events and Blogs
Featured

Time Limits under the Human Rights Act 1998: what is a “course of conduct”?

Anna Beale discusses the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the time limit provisions contained in the Human Rights Act 1998 in O’Connor v Bar Standards Board [2017] UKSC 78 The Statutory Provisions As will be known to most readers, the Human Rights Act 1998 (‘HRA 1998’) provides, in section 7(5)(a), that any proceedings brought against a public aut...
Continue reading
Featured

Not all in the family: migrant domestic worker who had to “pay” for accommodation and food wins minimum wage claim.

ABE-and-NC
In a minimum wage claim, brought by a migrant domestic worker, the High Court has addressed the “family worker” exemption found in the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015, specifically the provision relating to “deductions” in respect of accommodation and meals. Nathan Roberts considers the case and the trap the Defendants set for themselves. An...
Continue reading
Featured

Sleep-in workers revisited: a multi-factorial approach to eligibility for the minimum wage

Sleep-in workers revisited: a multi-factorial approach to eligibility for the minimum wage
Anna Beale considers the most recent guidance from the EAT on the vexed question of whether workers should receive the minimum wage for “sleep in” shifts. Keen readers of this site may recall my critical blog on the EAT decision in Shannon v Rampersad . In that case, HHJ Peter Clark decided that an ‘on call night care assistant’ in a residential ho...
Continue reading
Featured

No “reason why”: Essop and Naeem in the Supreme Court

No “reason why”: Essop and Naeem in the Supreme Court
Robin Allen QC and Anna Beale consider the latest case on indirect discrimination and ask the pressing question: are equal pay cases suddenly significantly easier for Claimants? The Supreme Court has today handed down judgment in the cases of Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency) and Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice . The judgment...
Continue reading
Featured

Certainty for all: a plea to the Taylor Review by Caspar Glyn QC, Anna Beale & Nathaniel Caiden

Certainty for all: a plea to the Taylor Review by Caspar Glyn QC, Anna Beale & Nathaniel Caiden
In November 2016, the government commissioned a review of modern employment practices. It is being led by Matthew Taylor and will focus on what has become known as the “gig economy”. In this blog, we summarise our written evidence to that review. Our central plea was that our legislators provide certainty for all. In our view this can best be achie...
Continue reading