The Latest from Cloisters

News, Publications, Policies, Events and Blogs

Such a clear dividing line? Maternity Leave and Shared Parental Leave: the EAT judgment in Ali v Capita UKEAT/0161/17/BA.

Rachel-Crasnow
On 11 April 2018 the EAT overturned the direct discrimination finding of the Tribunal in Ali v Capita Customer Management Ltd concerning whether employers who offer enhanced maternity pay must also offer enhanced Shared Parental Pay.  Rachel Crasnow QC considers the judgment in this blog. Cloisters' Chris Milsom acted for the intervener Workin...
Continue reading

12 Week rights for agency workers: Kocur v Royal Mail

Tom Coghlin QC considers the important judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Kocur v Royal Mail and anor UKEAT/0181/17 , a decision which brings much-needed clarification to the rights of agency workers to the same basic working and working conditions under the Agency Worker Regulations 2010. Nathaniel Caiden of Cloisters appeared for...
Continue reading

Olivia Dobbie on the Victoria Derbyshire show discussing Uber

Cloisters’ Olivia Dobbie spoke on the Victoria Derbyshire show in the build up to the Uber decision.  A link is available here.   Olivia's interview starts at 1 hour, 11 minutes.  

The EAT issues guidance on in-time amendment applications

Navid Pourghazi considers the recent decision in Gillett v Bridge 86 Ltd (UKEAT/0015/17/DM) where the EAT overturned a refusal of an in-time application to amend a claim form and provided helpful guidance on how Tribunals should deal with such applications in the future.  A copy of the judgment is available here . Analysis The Claimant present...
Continue reading

Deposit Orders: Not to be used as a “strike out through the back door”

Deposit Orders: Not to be used as a “strike out through the back door”
Chris Milsom succeeds before the EAT in Hemdan v Ishmail & Ors in an important case about the appropriate amount of a deposit order against someone who has very low means to pay. Navid Pourghazi discusses the case .   The facts The Claimant, who was a victim of trafficking, claimed that she had been employed in circumstances that amounted ...
Continue reading

Agency Employees, Unfair Dismissal and the Necessity of Communicating an Intention to Dismiss: the recent EAT judgment in Sandle v Adecco UK Ltd

Agency Employees, Unfair Dismissal and the Necessity of Communicating an Intention to Dismiss: the recent EAT judgment in Sandle v Adecco UK Ltd
Ed Williams and Caroline Musgrave appeared before the EAT in July 2016 to argue an important case for agency workers and those who bring or defend unfair dismissal claims in the context of agency employment. Navid Pourghazi discusses the Judgment.   Introduction The EAT’s decision in Sandle v Adecco UK Limited is a must-read for practitioners ...
Continue reading