The Latest from Cloisters

News, Publications, Policies, Events and Blogs

Acas early conciliation effect on tribunal time limits and the decision of Luton BC v Haque EAT/0180/17/JOJ

Navid Pourghazi   considers today’s judgment by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Luton BC v Haque , which concerned how the ACAS early conciliation provisions affect Tribunal time limits, and summarises the simple approach to take in calculating time limits following the most recent case law, drawing from submissions made by the appella...
Continue reading

12 Week rights for agency workers: Kocur v Royal Mail

Tom Coghlin QC considers the important judgment of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Kocur v Royal Mail and anor UKEAT/0181/17 , a decision which brings much-needed clarification to the rights of agency workers to the same basic working and working conditions under the Agency Worker Regulations 2010. Nathaniel Caiden of Cloisters appeared for...
Continue reading

Appeal court to scrutinise legality of enhanced shared parental pay

The Employment Appeal Tribunal will hear the appeal in  Ali v Capita Customer Management Ltd  tomorrow, Wednesday 20th December, on the issue of whether employers who offer enhanced maternity pay must also offer enhanced shared parental pay. The joined appeal of  Hextall v Chief Constable of Leicestershire Police  will take plac...
Continue reading

Baker v Abellio London Ltd: Are employers required to get documents proving workers’ rights to work?

No, according to the judgment of the EAT in Baker v Abellio London Ltd . Ruaraidh Fitzpatrick, a pupil at Cloisters considers this important judgment in which Chris Milsom represented the Claimant. Background The Claimant, Mr Baker, is a Jamaican national with the right to live and work in the United Kingdom. He was employed as a bus driver by the ...
Continue reading

Uber drivers are “workers”; Employment Appeal Tribunal confirms today

Today, the Employment Appeal Tribunal handed down its landmark decision in Aslam & Farrar v Uber confirming that Uber drivers are “workers” and entitled to be paid minimum wage, holiday pay and not be subjected to detriment if they blow the whistle. The judgment is here . Jason Galbraith-Marten QC and Sheryn Omeri represented the Claimant Uber ...
Continue reading