The Latest from Cloisters

News, Publications, Policies, Events and Blogs

Nathan Roberts appointed to the Attorney General's Panel of Counsel

Cloisters offers its congratulations to Nathan Roberts who has been appointed to the C Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown in his first year of eligibility. His appointment will take effect from March 2018.

Not all in the family: migrant domestic worker who had to “pay” for accommodation and food wins minimum wage claim.

ABE-and-NC
In a minimum wage claim, brought by a migrant domestic worker, the High Court has addressed the “family worker” exemption found in the National Minimum Wage Regulations 2015, specifically the provision relating to “deductions” in respect of accommodation and meals. Nathan Roberts considers the case and the trap the Defendants set for themselves. An...
Continue reading

Professional Disciplinary Case Digest – April 2017

A summary of legally noteworthy judicial reviews and High Court appeals regarding professional disciplinary panels and their decisions.   R (Zai Corporate Finance Ltd) v AIM Disciplinary Committee of the London Stock Exchange PLC & Anor [2017] EWHC 778 (Admin)              o Heari...
Continue reading

Same-sex marriage within the Church of England

Same-sex marriage within the Church of England
Nathan Roberts considers Pemberton v Bishop of Southwell and Nottingham , concerning a priest who was denied a licence to work in the NHS by the Church of England because he had married someone of the same sex. The case The Church of England’s opposition to same-sex marriage is a well-known if fraught matter. The Claimant is an ordained priest in t...
Continue reading

Cloisters barristers win award at the 2016 Camden Volunteer Awards Ceremony

Cloisters barristers win award at the 2016 Camden Volunteer Awards Ceremony
Cloisters is delighted to announce that Nathan Roberts , Tom Gillie and Navid Pourghazi were part of a group of barristers who won an award at the 2016 Camden Volunteer Awards Ceremony in recognition of their Pro Bono work for Camden Community Law Centre. The Camden Volunteer Awards recognises and celebrates the contributions of volunteers in the l...
Continue reading

ELA briefing features innovative articles by Cloisters

ELA briefing features innovative articles by Cloisters
Cloisters is consistently at the cutting edge of legal analysis.  The July edition of ELA briefing contains two articles by barristers at Cloisters.   Schona Jolly and Nathan Roberts produced an analysis of C-157/15 Achbita v G4S Secure Solutions NV entitled, “Secular workplaces v religious freedoms” which argues that the law is cham...
Continue reading

Employment status update

Employment status update
by Nathan Roberts Despite streams of case law on the status of workers and employees, new issues and principles keep emerging. On the horizon is litigation between various app-based companies and their users as to worker status. Litigation has also recently been brought by the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain on behalf of cycle couriers s...
Continue reading

Access to Justice: the EAT considers how courts can provide reasonable adjustments for disabled people

Access to Justice: the EAT considers how courts can provide reasonable adjustments for disabled people
In Rackham v NHS Professionals Ltd Langstaff P (as he then was), in the EAT, has given judgment on the existence and nature of the duty on tribunals and courts to make reasonable adjustments for disabled litigants. Rackham v NHS Professionals Ltd [2015] UKEAT/0110/15: the issues The Claimant brought a case of disability discrimination and unfair di...
Continue reading

How disabled people can get a fair hearing from the law courts

How disabled people can get a fair hearing from the law courts
John Horan and Nathan Roberts persuaded the President of the EAT, Langstaff P (as he then was), in the case of JW Rackham v NHS Professionals Ltd [2015] UKEAT to issue guidance for disabled people including a recommendation as to the Equal Treatment Bench Book’s ground rules hearing. The ground rules hearing has never been judiciously considered be...
Continue reading

Chris Milsom acts for successful respondent in EAT case concerning when interpreters are required

Chris Milsom acts for successful respondent in EAT case concerning when interpreters are required
By Nathan Roberts In Hak v St Christopher’s Fellowship [2015] UKEAT/0446/14/DA the EAT has declined to give specific guidance as to when a court or tribunal should provide an interpreter, instead finding that the matter should be determined on a case by case basis. As a rule of thumb, however, tribunals should “ask whether the litigant’s command of...
Continue reading