“Sarah is just brilliant. She is so, so clever, but so approachable in the way she communicates that intellect. Her academic background is palpable, but she is not unduly technical in style, and she is exceptionally human in her interactions with clients. She is just a delight to deal with, and I have the utmost respect for her.” (Employment) - Legal 500 2027

“Cuts through the evidence to the crux of an issue with laser-like precision. A delight to work with. Sensitive but clear with clients.” (Clinical Negligence) - Legal 500 2027

“Clients really appreciate her approachability and sensitivity. Her advices are always well drafted, and her knowledge and analysis of the law are exemplary.” “Sarah wears many hats as a silk, top academic and deputy EAT judge. On the main matter on which I worked with her, the other silks were united in praising the quality of her advocacy.” “I think she's exceptional. She's the perfect blend of being unbelievably clever and unbelievably practical, which is a rare achievement. She has the precision and mental breadth of a real intellectual academic but unlike some academic barristers, she's able to come down from the ivory tower and give you good practical advice.” (Employment) - Chambers & Partners 2027

Legal 500 2025: “The intellect of an academic, the client handling skills of a professional, the advocacy of an experienced silk makes Sarah the all round employment barrister she undoubtedly is.“ (Employment) “Very approachable; excellent on quantum issues; prepares cases thoroughly; her academic knowledge assists with her case work.” (Clinical Negligence)

Chambers & Partners 2025: "Sarah is excellent all round." "Sarah is an excellent advocate who is always very prepared." (Employment)

Legal 500 2024: "Sarah is hugely bright, responsive and a sharp advocate. A discrimination law expert.” (Employment) “Sarah is very bright, always well prepared, and she works with an intuitive grasp of the crucial medical and legal issues.” (Clinical Negligence)

Chambers & Partners 2024: “Sarah Fraser Butlin is an employment-specialist barrister who is hugely skilled in trade union cases, including union recognition matters and questions of worker status.”, “Sarah is very responsive and bright and has well-put-together pleadings.” and “She is very responsive and provides helpful and pragmatic advice.” (Employment)

Legal 500 2023: “Sarah is a leading academic and knows the law inside out. In an area like employment law, which is so dynamic, this is a real strength. Her written advocacy is strong, and she is very responsive and personable, and gives clear advice.”

Chambers & Partners 2023: "Sarah is excellent in all aspects of complex and high-profile matters, including advocacy, mediation and drafting." "She is fantastically bright and a really strong advocate." "She has an ability to present complex material in an understandable and appealing way."

Legal 500 2022: "She is a quietly fierce advocate who gets to the heart of the matter."

Chambers & Partners 2022: "She is an effective advocate: she is clear, she is to the point and she knows what the court is looking for." "She has expertise in trade union recognition and, as an academic as well as a practising barrister, she has a broad view of the law. She is also very user-friendly and clients loved her."

Legal 500 2021: “Very bright and technically able. Very strong on quantum and an excellent member of the team at conferences and roundtable settlement meetings. A breath of fresh air.”

Chambers & Partners 2021: "She's phenomenally able." "She's a good advocate: persuasive, clear and cogent."

Legal 500 2020: "She is extremely detailed in her work, but able to provide clear advice in complex cases."

Legal 500 2018: "Excellent with clients and at getting to grips with complex issues."

Chambers & Partners 2018: "Widely recognised for her specialist expertise within the field of clinical negligence, representing claimants in all manner of cases. She has appeared in a number of birth injury claims." "Very thorough." "Incredibly bright but also really personable and a team player. She really knows her stuff."

Legal 500 2014: "A very capable barrister, with a keen legal mind."

Chambers & Partners 2014: "..noted for her strength at appellate level, and is recognised for her strong grasp of the technical minutiae in a case. She is very bright, client-friendly and excellent at cross-examination."

Sarah is a Recorder in the Employment Appeal Tribunal and in the Crown and County Courts.

Sarah was Chair of the Industrial Law Society from 2019-2023.

She is also a member of ELA, ELBA and PIBA.

She regularly undertakes work under the ELAAS scheme at the Employment Appeal Tribunal and through the Bar Pro Bono Unit.

Sarah is a Fellow of Selwyn College, Cambridge and an Affiliated Lecturer in Labour law at the University of Cambridge.

Sarah co-authored the leading Labour law text book, Deakin and Morris’ Labour Law. She is currently writing a book “Reimagining Employment Dispute Resolution” exploring how employment disputes could be resolved more effectively, which will be published in May 2026. Sarah writes extensively. See full publication list.

MA (Cantab)

EMPLOYMENT AND DISCRIMINATION

• Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia v Costantine [2025] UKSC 9: Successfully responding to appeal in Supreme Court and establishing that the Benkharbouche test applies to technical and administrative workers in an embassy. Leading Tamar Burton.

• Higgs v Farmor’s School [2025] EWCA Civ 109 and [2023] EAT 89: Acting for the intervenor in the Court of Appeal and EAT who adopted the intervenor’s approach to manifestation of belief cases by integrating Articles 9 and 10 ECHR with the EqA.

• R (on the application of the IWGB) v Secretary of State for BEIS [2019] EWHC 728 (Admin); [2021] EWCA Civ 260: Challenge to Schedule A1 recognition requirements and “joint employer" claim before the CAC.

• Coxhill v Unite the Union [2020] UKEAT0084/20/1706: Trade union membership and unjustifiable discipline.

• O'Sullivan v DSM Demolition Ltd [2020] UKEAT0257/19/1505: Continuity of employment.

• O'Eachtiarna v CitySprint: high profile cycle courier worker status. On appeal to EAT.

• McTigue v University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trust [2016] ICR 1155; [2016] IRLR 742: Important appeal on extended definition of worker in whistleblowing claims.

• Morrissey v University of London [2016] ICR 893; [2016] IRLR 487: Meaning of to "elect or appoint" negotiating representatives in Regulation 14 ICE Regs.

• Ibarz v University of Sheffield UKEAT/0018/15: Meaning of series of similar acts under the Fixed Term Employees Regulations and Part Time Workers Regulations. In addition, successfully persuading the EAT that Goldwater v Sellafield [2015] IRLR 381 was wrongly decided and thus recovered fees paid by a union.

• GMB v Henderson [2016] EWCA Civ 1049; [2015] IRLR 451: Political belief and burden of proof.

CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE

• Infected Blood Inquiry: Junior Counsel to the Inquiry.

• N: successful settlement of cerebral palsy claim for £9million. Sole counsel.

• Walker: Inquest into maternal death resulting in Report for the Prevention of Future Deaths addressing wide ranging failures in maternity care. Civil claim ongoing.

• Zeromska Smith v United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2019] EWHC 552 and 980: High value psychiatric claim following negligent still birth.

• K: Inquest dealing with the failure to recognise occlusion of a prosthetic mitral valve arising out of the deceased's pregnancy and under anti-coagulation. Following submissions, a Report for the Prevention of Future Deaths was made. Civil claim settled for £575,000.

• Various women v Frimley Health: multiple high profile claims dealing with negligent treatment by Urogynaecologist.

• ENE: successful settlement of hypoxic brain injury claim for £8million; junior to Patricia Hitchcock KC.

• ETS: successful settlement of cerebral palsy claim for £8.1million. Junior to Simon Taylor KC.

OTHER CIVIL LITIGATION

• Bains v Moore & K2 (2017): High Court action, alleged breach of privacy and confidence by an 'industrial spy'.

• Cedric Slack & Partners Ltd(in liquidation) v Slack [2010] EWCA Civ 204: Appeal relating to constructive trusts and laches.